Search for: "FAILS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS"
Results 1 - 20
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
In Rashid, the claimant lost the certainty of asylum when the SSHD failed to apply the correct policy in deciding his asylum claim. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:15 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:08 am
(R (Lumba) v Secretary of state for the Home Department (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 12). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
What is the correct approach to assessing medical evidence in asylum claims alleging torture? [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
HELD- All three appeals dismissed The Unduly Harsh Test The meaning of the unduly harsh test was previously considered by the Supreme Court in KO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 53, which the Secretary of State submitted the Court of Appeal failed to follow in HA/RA. [read post]
New Judgment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
26 Jul 2017, 2:39 am
To determine the initial criterion, the Supreme Court held that the burden of proof of establishing that the proposed marriage is one of convenience falls on the Secretary of State. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Secretary, Department of Corrections, United States District Judge Mary Scriven granted a writ of habeas corpus filed by James Guzman because the state failed to disclose a witness had been paid. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 119 This appeal considered what the correct approach is to the assessment of medical evidence in asylum claims alleging torture. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:30 am
Department of Corrections, 2015 U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
For example, acts of gay intimacy are illegal and punishable by up to 10 years of hard labour, and lesbians are routinely subject to “corrective” rape. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
(R(I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
The lower courts were therefore correct to refuse her application on this ground. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:57 am
So, the Appellant’s deportation to Jamaica by the Secretary of State for the Home Department would be unlawful unless the Appellant “can reasonably be expected to stay” in the rural areas of Jamaica. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 11:58 am
B306301) 2021 WL 4350480 Summary: Jose Alex Mendez appealed the denial of a recommendation by the secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to recall his sentence under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(1). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
The correct appreciation of the effect of Pankina was apparent in R (on the application of Nough) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2010) EWHC 2218 (Admin). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
